I’m feeling a need to prepare for writing application essays and explaining this nearly sudden change in my plans, so this gets to be my brainstorming.

When I was in my teacher prep program during my undergrad days, I had to write a philosophy of teaching for one of my early classes. Mine centered around informal learning, guided discovery, and facilitation. It wasn’t terribly surprising to any of my professors as it kept showing up in class portfolios and such. I was the oddball. I was the one all the teachers thought was wasting her talents by looking toward a career in museum education instead of taking on a classroom.

The simple fact of the matter was, by the time I got to my teacher prep program, I had taught in a museum and a planetarium, and had absolutely fallen in love with it. I loved being able to physically build show and exhibit components, and then introduce people to them. During my teacher prep days, I worked in a museum and an aquarium. I loved doing all sorts of research and developing workshops and tours.

When I was accepted into a museum science graduate program, I thought my heart would just burst. I worked in a training museum with a planetarium attached. I was the only student in the program to have her own office where I sat amidst old dusty astronomy books, video tapes, and old show files to create everything from a show intro to workshops to summer camp activities to teacher guides.

To me, it was the best job in the world!

Sadly, it was a road too short. I was considered “overqualified” before I went to grad school, and it didn’t get any better after that. I interviewed for one Education Director position, but was ultimately rejected because I had no background or interest in fundraising. (At some point, someone is going to have to explain to me what education has to do with fundraising.)

What I most loved about my career as a museum educator is written on a sticky note over my desk to remind me of what makes me happy. Some of it is finding its way slowly into this website. I am happy when I’m researching, when I’m developing curriculum. I can live with low to moderate teaching duties so long as I can get in some training time, too.

My current job is actually perfect in that second respect. I supervise. I support. I teach occasionally. I train fellow teachers. If I do get into grad school on the other side of the country, I want to see if I can just transfer my job (not necessarily at my current level).

It’s missing that whole research and devleopment aspect, though. I really do miss it. This is why my path is taking me into instructional design. Well, that and the fact every job that catches my attention is related to instructional design. I think this is a good match, me creating multimedia learning experiences. It address so many of my needs at once- to create, to research, to develop, to teach!

A while back, I wrote something in one of my blogs about how writers are a lot like actors. I had just listened to an interview with a voice actor who said something about one of the great challenges of his job is to deliver interrupted lines like the rest of that sentence actually existed.

I sat there and thought about that for a bit. I used to do all manner of performing arts, including drama and ballet. I think it’s not just a need to understand that the line you only have a portion of at one point in time also had a rest of itself, but also understanding the comings and goings of your character. The character came from somewhere into the scene we see on the stage. The character is going somewhere when they leave the stage. The stage is just as focal point.

It’s much the same way with a well-written story. The writer has to know and understand what isn’t seen “on stage” and tell the story with this certainty that something does happen to the character before they appear or after they disappear. This is what leads to beloved characters, favorite worlds, and adoring fans. It creates a believable world.

I thought myself pretty happy with that comparison until a writer friend last week listed things her dance teacher used to say that she felt apply to dancing. While writing and the performing arts share a great deal in common “on stage”, they share things off stage in common, too.

It was simple things like, “Practice”, “If you can see the audience, they can see you”, etc. Writing, like the performing arts, has this technical side that must be worked on and honed to a fine craft. I knew this already, but for some reason reading this list just made it stand out for me.

I haven’t quite figured out how I’m going to make this work for me, but something tells me it’ll stay with me for a long while.

Originally posted to 100 Bloggers

Late last summer, I started teaching writing at work. Since I write a lot on my own, it was assumed I’d do great at teaching writing

I was pretty nervous. I still am when confronted by a writing student, although I know a lot of that now has to do more with a teacher in the center who has decided we must all do everything her way, despite the fact she has been told she’s not always right.

I sat there teaching grammar and parts of speech. I explained the point of the thesis sentence. I just felt paralyzed when it came to revising and editing because a fellow teacher had told me that it was a no-no to offer any sort of help at these stages. It turns out that was wrong, but I was still terrified to help.

Not long after I became a writing teacher, I started grading papers for a local high school. I was asked to make specific comments and to help with grammar. The second I could do easily enough from my time as an editor. The first…yeah, that paralyzing fear from the first job held me back. I think it actually cost me the job.

A few months ago, I started editing for people on a freelance basis. Without even thinking about it, I’ve attacked these stories with the same energy I attacked my editing job. No idea why. Before long, I realized I was starting to treat the center papers the same way- making comments on the sides, circling grammar and spelling errors for the student to correct.

It’s been odd to watch myself shift. It’s been a great benefit to everyone I work with.

I’m teaching a pilot program prep class for the state standardized test, and one of the biggest problem is that there wasn’t enough material planned for each class meeting.

When we had issues last week, one of the kids suggested a game of Hangman. At first, I wanted to say “no”, but then I quickly saw an opening to turn it into something useful. “Sure,” I agreed, “as long as all the terms are math-related.” My kids weren’t exactly thrilled, but they quickly got into the spirit. They put up the order of operations spelled out. They put up shapes, math facts, vocabulary with definitions. It was amazing to watch.

This week, we were once again short for material in many of the class sections. The first time we needed material, I wrote a series of fractions all over the board, and they took turns going up and creating equivalent ratios. During our next few breaks, I had the students take turns creating problems for each other. Their problems were incredible. They weren’t simple. There was a order of operations problem, a couple solving for x, some factoring and multiplying of polynomials. To end the class, I had them race to fill the board first with prime numbers and then with composite numbers. They were so cute as they corrected each other’s numbers and tried to write a number before a classmate.

I wonder what we’ll do for our last class meeting…

No, this isn’t a chance to debate if you’d rather be on screen or off screen. Apparently, Hollywood is now being used to seduce students into pursuing careers other than acting, directing, and the myriad of technical positions needed to create today’s movies.

Apparently, students can now be lured into the unexpectedly waning careers of science and engineering by a flashy Hollywood movie. As one who has spent much of her teenage and adult life teaching science in cultural institutions, I’m not afraid to admit that this idea terrifies me.

I can see it now- “Become an engineer, save stranded astronauts, become a movie character!” (Sorry, I was watching Apollo 13 last night.)

I’ve never thought of science or engineering as fields that needed to lure people in with smarmy tactics. Somehow, in my own romanticized view of the world, I thought people fell into science much the same way I did- natural curiosity and a love for playing in labs and observatories. Of course, this is also a world where people’s dirty little secret is that they admire men like Buzz Aldrin and Jonas Salk even as they’re proclaiming a public love for insipid people like Britney Spears.

What are we coming to if our students need to lured into these fields by the movies?

That’s how one of the younger writing students remembers me now.

Last week, I was working with this student on prepositions. I don’t know how anybody else learned prepositions, but I had to watch this dorky video about a rabbit and a box. At least, the rabbit was cute! So, I was using the idea of a rabbit and a box to teach the student. I made a little bunny with one hand and a box with the other (It was a fist, but she got the point).

I kept making the rabbit hand do things in relation to the box hand, trying to help her see different prepositions. At one point, my little rabbit was jumping off the the box, and the student kept saying “over”. Trying to get her to say “off”, I had the bunny fall sideways off the box. The student gleefully said, “The bunny falls off the box and dies!” She even drew a picture of it on her worksheet.

We finally managed to get to an understanding that the preposition was “off”, but when she saw me earlier this week, she pointed at me and said, “Dead bunny!” I just walked past and said, “Yep, that’s me. I’m a dead bunny.” I don’t think the teacher was particularly amused. I was. After all, I am a Rabbit.

A Rabbit who will forever be “Dead Bunny” to one of her students…

…and that student will never forget prepositions again!

I’ve always considered myself to have a pretty strong grasp on grammar, and English language arts in general. Lately, though, I think some terms have come into confusion.

I teach at a tutoring center, which baffled me the other day. I have to teach homonyms and multiple meaning words. One problem- they’re the same thing.

I looked up homonym and got the following definition: “one of two or more words spelled and pronounced alike but different in meaning (as the noun quail and the verb quail)”

This matches with what I think a homonym is. It’s the same word with a different meaning.

What I’m being asked to teach as “homonyms” are actually homophones- words that sound alike but are spelled differently. The same handy dictionary had the following to say on the matter: “one of two or more words pronounced alike but different in meaning or derivation or spelling (as the words to, too, and two)”.

How did these two terms not only become confused, but become synonymous. (The dictionary actually suggested that “homonym” is a synonym for “synonym”. I was beside myself!)

I’m doing a much better job about staying on task and working on site-related tasks! This past week has seen the addition of link to my del.icio.us categories from each Niche! My original plan was to create a self-updating link page, but del.icio.us has changed how they handle that, and my tech level isn’t high enough to play with the changes.

The good news is that in light of the problems I’m having, and my web guru’s lack of free time, I am now reading a couple of resources and trying to teach myself PHP. I taught myself HTML and CSS. This can’t be any harder than those, right? (If it makes anyone feel better, I have about two years of baby programming experience under my belt. They were over ten years ago, but helped me pick up HTML and CSS more quickly.)

I’m actually pleased with the work going on behind the scenes here at the moment. More of the website is coming together. The day I figure out how to syndicate the most recent posts from each of the Niche blogs to this page will be a definite cause for celebration! JewelryNiche has received its first two orders of the year- a stock piece and a commission. It is my intent to have Niche swag available as soon as I can, too!

So much to do, and I’m sitting here sipping hot chocolate and contemplating how two of my favorite past times are alike.

Mathemagenic shared some interesting links last week.

One of those was this post that compares information architecture to scaffolding. It’s not scaffolding the way we educators tend to think about scaffolding. It’s not talking about accessing prior knowledge and building on it. In this case, it’s talking about scaffolding from a building point of view. How scaffolds allow things to be built, to be supported and strengthened. It’s really an intriguing analogy in the context of social learning.

It then discusses knowledge management in this context. Really…fascinating discussion.

I spend quite a bit of time blogging or reading blogs. In fact, blogging has kind of taken over my life for the past two years. I started my first blog when they were just becoming a new toy for the masses.

So, i guess it just really bothers me when those aspiring to A-list or those involved in edublogging get all up in arms when others create a link blog.

I’ve decided that these ambitious folk don’t remember how the web log got started. It wasn’t as a journal, or a means of self-publishing, or a marketing tool. It was for the purpose of storing links people found interesting on the web. Some people just logged their links. Others wrote notes to help themselves remember why they were logging the link.

In time, people constructed narratives around their links, and the narratives became personal. People started visiting these pages for suggestions on what to read. Search engines saw these link blogs as support for whether a site was good.

When someone creates a link blog, they are blogging in its original form. Perhaps the wanna-be A-listers and the edubloggers should go back and do their homework. Blogging history can be a fun thing!

© 2010 Rebecca Thomas Designs Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 72 access attempts in the last 7 days.