I’ve always liked the song at the end of Bedazzled. The chorus tells us, “If you want to be somebody else, change your mind.” It’s so true. If you don’t like how things are going in your life, it often takes little more than just taking a different perspective on what’s happening to help change things around for us.

Over the weekend, I was reading David Lorenzo’s Carnival of Career Intensity and found this post that really echoed that song line. In this case, the mindset that needed changing was how he viewed his job, and I love the change he made. My job really struggles to help me make ends meet and cuts up my day in such a way that taking on any second job that isn’t a freelance job impossible. I’ve been told repeatedly that any sane person would have walked out long ago, but I’ve stuck with it.

Am I crazy? Probably, but I also love my job. It lets me do something that I would do regardless of whether or not I had a job that paid me to do it, and I love the company. I already pretty much have a hobby of teaching, and my current job pays me to do it. Yeah, I do some administrative work I’m not wild about, but I want to see things move smoothly, so I do it to help out.

If you’re finding your energy at work flagging, you might seriously give this article a read. If it doesn’t change your outlook on your job, then maybe it’s time to find a new job.

I am an introvert.

No, seriously. I’m an introvert. I’m so introverted it’s crippling at times. That’s when I have to create a punishment system to drive myself out of my purple cave. My roommates think it’s funny. They like when I start trying to work through some of my introvert issues because it means they might actually see for some reason other than I’m hungry or in need of massive amounts of cocoa. (It also generally means I’m about to do something that will leave one of them a laughing stock, but they seem to think this is okay.)

I have repeatedly taken the Myers-Briggs test as part of various college courses, and up until a year or two ago, they all came back saying I’m an INFJ (now an INFP, apparently). The great thing about the Myers-Briggs is that you generally get to see the scales when you get your report. I’m right on the line on every single scale EXCEPT the Extrovert-Introvert scale, where I’m squarely on the Introvert side.

I’m an introvert.

Surprisingly, a number of the bloggers I run into are also introverts, many of them fellow INFJs. It’s kind of interesting. We’re all here for our own reasons, but the fact is…we’re here. Hiding out online.

Lorelle on WordPress shared an article yesterday on blogging for introverts. Many of us commented (you should all pat me on the back). I scanned the article briefly, and then went back and read it. Somehow, my introverted self felt a bit miffed. For starters, I feel mostly confident in my knowledge. I’m a teacher, for crying out loud! One who just finally launched a blog that will hopefully lead to a couple of books sharing my knowledge on math and writing. I’m considered brilliant, and I don’t generally question that.

Secondly, introverts are supposed to shy away from any form of criticism. Funny that…one of the reasons my directors like me at work is because I don’t mind taking corrections. I confused Sensei routinely because I worked to apply corrections she gave me, but would then become frustrated with myself because I was taking too long (in my own opinion) to internalize the corrections. I even received a subscription on deviantArt last year after taking a critique graciously. (Everyone else said it was overly harsh, but I found that he addressed many of the concerns that had been running in the back of my mind in very helpful ways.) While there are people in my life who manage not to frame their corrections and criticism in a manner I will take, I can generally handle criticism, and even seek it out on things I’m working on.

I can have my low self-esteem days. I can withdraw to the point of doing myself serious psychological harm. But the simple fact of the matter is I’m an introvert who can find some relief for her introversion here in the blogosphere.

So many posts lately are really resonating with me because they address either some new practice I’ve picked up, or an old practice I’m using again, or something I’ve done forever.

This article on paper prototyping fits under the second category. I used to do all my design and planning on paper before committing to the actual project. Somewhere along the way, I stopped doing this and almost stopped designing. At the beginning of the year, I dedicated a notebook to helping me get through projects.

It serves multiple purpose, almost more like a journal than anything else. I brainstorm article ideas, blog posts, art, anything. In fact, at the moment several drafts of an article, complete with sketches of the art for the article, are sitting in the notebook. The pages may not be all together in the notebook, but they’re all there with my notes and thoughts.

It’s great because I can work through everything, and it’s portable. I can pull it out and work whenever I have some down time.

Paper is just a great planning tool.

Sorry for the dead air around here over the past few days. Things have been either crazy or lethargic…or both.

The funy part is, I had this post lying in my head, just waiting to spring itself on the world.

So…in the middle of my kids preparing for finals last week, I got to teach a skill that I love. Today’s tidbit is a review of that lesson.

Last fall, I was teaching an SAT prep class. One of the students was a seventh grader. I panicked. I knew I was going to have to teach him both FOIL and rational functions. He ended up dropping before we hit rational functions, but I successfully taught this child how to FOIL. Now it’s your turn!

FOIL is an acronym that stands for: First, Outer, Inner, Last. It’s the formula for multiplying polynomials.

Let’s try it out on the following problem.

(x + 3)(x + 2)

According to our acronym, we start by multiplying the first terms in both polynomials.

(x + 3)(x + 2) = x2

Now we’ll multiply the outer terms and put the result behind the result of multplying the first terms.

(x + 3)(x+ 2) = x2 + 2x

Next up, the inner terms!

(x +3)(x + 2) = x2 + 2x +3x

The last part of our acronym tells us to multiply the last terms of the polynomials together.

(x + 3)(x +2) = x2 + 2x + 3x + 6

We’ve multplied everything, but we aren’t quite done yet. See those two middle terms? We can simplify the expression by combining these two terms. The sleek new equation looks like this:

x2 + 5x + 6

And now we’re done!

I have been taking a break from being active in fan fiction circles for the past few months, but something happened last week that dragged me right back. I write for a rather volatile fandom (which actually isn’t the problem for a change) and edit for a usually calm one.

Recently, that second fandom has made any fights in the first fandom look like the preschool sandbox. Essentially, one writer posts their new story, and another writer likes an element of it and builds their own story based around the element. Often, the second writer will admit they were inspired by the first writer, but sometimes that acknowledgment isn’t present. It doesn’t actually matter, though, because invariably the first writer will go to their off-site blog and scream, “Plagiarism!”

By the actual definition of plagiarism, that’s not what’s happened at all. Nothing has been technically plagiarized. A story element has appeared in another story that generally goes an entirely different direction. What’s even funnier is the writers who lift complete sentences and paragraphs from another’s story (these are the actual plagiarists); more often than not, they’re the ones who become enraged when they find a story element lifted from their story.

I guess what I find the most funny about the whole mess is that these same (usually) teenagers who whine when someone riffs on their work is that they even write fan fiction at all. By their own definition, the existence of fan fiction is plagiarism (It’s not, although there are several American authors who will persecute anyone who publicly writes fan fiction set in their worlds.) When we write fan fiction, we’re taking something about the world and putting it in a context it hasn’t been. We may be writing a “This is how that should have gone” piece, or a “What you didn’t see off camera” piece. I happen to have a great deal of fun using the last scene of every Yu-Gi-Oh GX episode as a writing prompt. I like to write the scene that would have come after the last one you see. It’s a great exercise. Some people like to take unusual groupings of characters, set them in a new situation, and write out how the scene would resolve. Others like to explore what would happen if a character was different.

For those of us in America wrestling with copyright fights and defining and defending intellectual property, there is at least the Creative Commons license (which I like to apply to as much of my writing as I can). Those of us willing to let others build off what we’ve done, to allow for artistic collaboration in a way, can give certain rights to our fellow creators. I guess we align ourselves with the writers and other creators in other countries who not only don’t pursue any sort of copyright infringement suit, but encourage people to create derivative works. They find it flattering that someone liked their work enough to create something based on their work. (This would be why things like doujinshi exist…)

As for me, if someone wants to riff on my work, I’d be flattered. They just need to make sure they observe my Creative Commons licenses and share their work with me! (Hey, if someone is going to go to the effort of writing their take on my work, I’d at least like to see it and appreciate it!)

Two-thirds of the way through my exploration of creative nonfiction books, I feel like I’ve learned more about crafting fiction than nonfiction. I guess that somehow, that was to be expected since creative nonfiction seems to be widely defined as nonfiction told through a dramatic method.

Writing Creative Nonfiction was actually the first book I wanted to read on creative nonfiction. I don’t remember how I stumbled onto it, but I remember reading a review of it and thinking that it sounded interesting. The review said that the book would help you craft better nonfiction writing, especially if you were writing instructional material. I can only assume the person read a very small section of the book, because nearly the entire book is one long discussion on dramatic vs summary method and how to weave them together. It even warns at one point that the techniques will be difficult to apply to an instructional or reporting situation.

All of that said, and knowing my goal is to craft the Dead Bunny works carefully and well, I plunged on and learned a lot about dramatic writing and summary writing. Again, I’m not sure if I’ll be able to use this to help spice up and weave Dead Bunny articles into a coherent book, but you never know.

Let’s start with dramatic writing, which receives far more time than summary writing. Dramatic writing is generally considered the domain of fiction because it revolves around the scene. It contains the action, the motion in the piece. It pulls the reader close to the story, shows them details that might be missed in an overview. It contains thoughts, dialogue, actions. It gives us an idea of what is driving the people involved of the event without ever telling us what to think. Because it usually involves a lot of intimate details (mannerisms, inner thoughts), nonfiction writers feel they have to avoid this style of writing because it’s not necessarily objective, it evokes emotion from the reader, and it may require the writer to draw conclusions they can’t completely prove.

The summary method, on the other hand, is the narrative that holds these scenes together. It gives us the general overview when we really don’t need to know the small details. It contains more of the information that you wouldn’t glean from interacting with the people involved in the short period of time you know during the nonfiction piece, and it tends toward a more objective view on the situation, thereby making the story feel more familiar, more comfortable.

The book goes on at length about both methods, breaking them down into other types of writing. The book also includes sections on sharpening your writing, conducting research, and maintaining ethics in your nonfiction writing. I’m sure I’ll be reviewing my notes frequently, just because I came away with so much useful information.

It might even strengthen my fiction writing while helping me develop my nonfiction voice.

The boys gave me a Nintendo DS for Christmas (complete with the new Spyro game, which is kicking my butt! I love it!!)

I’ve been borrowing other games off them, too. My favorite is Brain Age (which I really need my own copy of). It’s supposed to contain a series of activities to help you keep your brain young. You begin by checking your brain’s current age through a series of tests. (Mine started out at 41.) Then you work on activities every day, occasionally retaking the Brain Age check to see how you’re doing. (For the record, today I’m 34, which works because I’ve been feeling old for the past couple of days. My best is 29, which the program told me made me very young.)

The activities are mostly fun. There are a couple of calculation drills. You get to read and count syllables. The most annoying ones include sorting numbers from low to high very quickly and keeping track of people coming and going from a house.

The coolest part for me is that there are a plethora of sudoku problems included, so I’ve been haivng fun working my way through them. I really like how they’re set up. It’s very easy to work with, compared with other computer-based sudoku games I’ve played.

Along the way, you get to remember what you ate for dinner or saw on the news a few days before. You even get to draw pictures (which isn’t fun for me, the girl who can’t draw).

If you have the opportunity to try it out, there’s a quick play option to get a feel for the game.

I’m a bit of an organization junkie. Seriously, I have so many things I’m working on at any given point in time that I have separate to-do lists for each one to help me get through them all. (You all now officially know the secret to my success, by the way.)

In any given week, I’m usually working on no more than three lists at the same time. I take tasks from each list and add them to a master to-do list, which then becomes my focus for the week. It helps me work through projects to completion. It helps me think about the smaller details of a project so they don’t get overlooked.

It also has the added benefit of giving me options to work on when I either finish the list or (which happens more frequently) get bored with what I’m working on. When I need a change of pace, I simply go to one of the other lists and pull a quick task. I get one step closer on something, and it’s usually enough of a break to allow to get back to clearing out the week’s master list.

We all have our own way of keeping on top of what we want to work on. What’s yours?

I had to laugh at this Luann comic the other day. The entire story line has actually been great, but this was the clincher. While there are little girls who would absolutely hang on every single word Tiffany says, there are many who would act exactly like the little girls in this strip, challenging that they have to do things that make them feel fake in order to be regarded as something resembling pretty. In fact, most of the girls I teach would challenge Tiffany just like these girls.

It’s encouraging, really.

What was even more amusing for me, though, was the quote in the post right below this comic in my feed reader.

“To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day, to make you everybody else means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight; and never stop fighting.” — E.E. Cummings, 1955 (Source)

Talk about a cosmic message. Be natural. Fight to be yourself. It’s a lesson we can all take to heart and encourage in our peers and future generations.

I spend a fair bit of time helping students navigate the scary world of research papers. Nearly every single one of them brings their resources, which almost always consists of nothing but Wikipedia articles.

I do my best not to cry at the fact their teachers have not explained to them what constitutes valid research material, and then explain to the student why I won’t permit them to use the Wikipedia article as a primary resource. I’m sorry. I get the concept of pooling the wisdom of the masses, but it’s not vetted. It’s prone to the whims of people who don’t bother to check themselves before they change an entry, or those who wish to sabotage others’ valid efforts.

The students protest, but I don’t back down. I tell them that they can use Wikipedia to help them get started on a topic if they can’t find information any other way. This means they can use an article, but they must actually go through and research all of the facts present (which really translates to not using the article as anything but a jumping off point).

I may rethink that strategy, though. Or perhaps I should just reinforce it. Either way, Wikipedia has lost even more face with me thanks to this recent discovery.

And to think, I remember when the most scandalous bit of Wikipedia trivia was the fact that the founder was changing his article, and not in ways that supported the spirit of his own site.

© 2010 Rebecca Thomas Designs Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 72 access attempts in the last 7 days.