Still working through competency-based resumes (I only get a small bit of time each week to work on this, so it’s taking me a while.), I’ve run into something I’d like to talk through here. Please feel free to add your thoughts in the comments, because this is one of those things where I think multiple viewpoints would really help clarify the matter.

I’ve run into a section of the core competencies that talks about “technical proficiencies”, and I nearly ignored the section. When I hear the word “technical”, my mind just automatically defaults to anything electronic, most often the computer. I’m fairly handy with my computer. I help other people understand how to complete basic tasks on their computer. I’ve helped a number of my coworkers set up their computers with tools to help them keep their computers safe. I surf. I research. I blog. I write. I occasionally write a bit of HTML or CSS code (and am relearning bits and pieces of LaTeX. I can’t take apart a computer and mess with its innards, but my friends who do that for a living tell me it’s okay, and doesn’t impair my status as a geek.

I’ve realized, though, that my definition of “technical” is pretty short-sighted. For example, I was a good ballerina from a technical standpoint. I was just missing the polish that separates a technically proficient dancer from a great dancer. From a technical standpoint, I’m a great writer. I have a good command of the English language, and my grammar is nearly flawless. I can even determine the correct format and tone to use depending on if I’m writing how-tos, nonfiction, or fiction.

One could even say I’m proficient from a technical standpoint in my teaching. I understand wait times 1 and 2, and implement them in my teaching. I employ questioning, redirecting, and reframing strategies well. I can even complete technically proficient lesson plans in three different styles on command.

So, the question of technical proficiency isn’t one of how well I can wield technology. It’s how well I understand and implement the nuts and bolts of what I’m doing.

Now it’s your turn. What do you think of when you hear the term “technical proficiency”? Do you agree that it’s having a firm grasp of the underlying basics of your field, or is it something else?

Posted by Rebecca in Uncategorized