I was getting dressed for work this morning and noticed the bowl that holds some of my more frequently worn or recently acquired jewelry, and I just really liked how the pieces were laying in there.

I don’t know if they translate into this post, but most of the more visible pieces have notes on them. Some were hand-crafted. Some I just keep for fun.
Last year, one of the io9 editors complained that the Hero’s Journey is male-specific, and no one ever approaches it with a female character.
But I’m currently reading Mercedes Lackey’s Elemental Masters series, and while the books themselves aren’t impressing me, they’re making me think. Each novel retells a different fairy tale, presenting a different take on Beauty, Cinderella, and Briar Rose.
The retellings are interesting because they do show the core of each girl’s story, and in revisiting each girl in that different light Lackey actually shows how much the Hero’s Journey story structure affects fairy tale heroines. Each girl goes on a transformative journey where she loses something or someone important to her, meets someone (often supernatural) who wants to help guide her through her journey, meets a supernatural being who wants to stop her journey, experiences some form of death, and emerges changed and ready to take her place as the heroine she is.
So, the question isn’t, “Why don’t women have stories told in the Hero’s Journey format?” It’s “Why can’t we see the Hero’s Journey format for what it is, regardless of the gender of the character?”
It’s something to think about.
I grew up with fairy tales, and the princess was always in some big, frilly, pink, sparkly dress… or she was in a dress that called to mind Medieval Europe. Then, one day I watched a version of Cinderella where everyone was in period garb right up until the ball, and then the women were all in one of five different ballgown styles, any of which would have graced a contemporary prom.
The costume designer had clearly tried to make the gowns blend into the fairy tale castle and the provincial costumes favored by the men, but the disconnect was there. Given that fairy tales come from all over the world and all different time periods, it made me start wondering why interpretations are inevitably set in a Medieval or Renaissance setting, or refer to those time periods in some fashion.
I’m reading the Elemental Masters series by Mercedes Lackey, and I find them interesting. Each one is a retelling (some more successfully than others) of a fairy tale, and they’re all set in Victorian England. Corsets knock the wind out of a Water Master. A medium is sent away to school in England while her parents do missionary work in Africa. They don’t break that setting, and it’s refreshing.
They’re considered historical fantasy, something I’ve thought about a hundred times since my days in a Renaissance LARP. I’ve tried to capture it in themed movie afternoons that provide the background to my work sometimes. It’s interesting because fairy tales in and of themselves are historical. They were a means of teaching, a means of entertaining, which makes them perfect to my work.
In writing, there is a type of story called the “Quest Narrative” where the main character faces and conquers obstacles that change her as she proceeds on a vague quest. The process of transformation becomes the story. It’s a fairly common story type, but I’ve been thinking about it quite a bit over the last few months.
I’ve been told, repeatedly, that I’d make a great fictional character. There’s an implication there that I’d worry about, except I’m usually never alone when things happen, and when I am, there’s a piece of tangible evidence to prove I haven’t lost my mind.
But recently, I admitted to a friend that I probably need to try to write out my story as a fictionalized tale as a form of therapy, and started writing down what I consider to be important events and details. Then, I went to organize my writing notes and drafts form old stories and made a horrible discovery: I have been trying to write my own story.
I’m not a fan of chick lit, but I noticed last year that I keep tying to write it, and I’ve been adding in moments from my life. It’s like I’ve been trying to turn myself into a Mary Sue without ever actually making my characters be a Mary Sue. I can’t decide if my subconscious has been trying to call for help through my fiction, or if I let things get to me so badly that it completely interfered with my ability to create the fiction I’d rather be writing. I’ve been wrestling with this for nearly a year, and still can’t find the answer.
Now that I am aware of it, though, I’m wondering what affect it’s going to have on my writing. Will my characters start expressing more of my past?
My parents and I read Dan Brown’s books together. They’d finish them and then pass them along to me. When I was handed Digital Fortress, I was given a summary that could easily have been mistaken for The Da Vinci Code (especially because my parents defined each character by their Da Vinci Code counterpart). While the plots are different, the characters are formulaic. I haven’t seen anything recently published by Brown, but I’m sure fans would recognize the character types in a heartbeat, and would beg for something we haven’t seen before.
We as consumers are an odd lot. We cry for something “new’, but when a creator gives us that something new, we complain about how they’ve forgotten what made their original work so beloved.
I haven’t seen much from Dan Brown in recent years, but I am an avid Joss Whedon fan. After being dragged into Buffy the Vampire Slayer, I sat through Angel (which had spin-off pans), Firefly (which often serves as background noise while I’m working), and Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog. Like many of Whedon’s fan, I’ve come to expect a certain style or tone from his shows.
And like many Whedon fans, I was dismayed to find that lacking from Dollhouse. In fact, up until I read about the seven pilots, I was struggling to make myself continue watching the series, joining others in agreeing that the series wasn’t his usual caliber.
Friday night, as I watched the episode take an unexpected and welcome twist, I realized that I was complaining about not having what I was used to. Dollhuse doesn’t feature the traits that have made Whedon’s other shows so engaging. It’s something different. It’s a chance for us to see what else he can do, to give him a chance to break his own formula.
I’m interested in seeing where Dollhouse goes. I miss the witty banter, but I can access that just about any time I want. Now it’s time to see what else he can do well.
I think I’ve spent the better part of my life trying to tell a story in words. I’m not sure it’s been an entirely successful venture, but I keep trying.
It’s kind of funny, too. I love reading books. There’s a thrill in letting the words play in your mind to create a picture, a movie of the book.
But I’ve realized as I’ve read more and more manga (Japanese graphic novels) over the past couple of years that I enjoy the effect of words and pictures together. I still enjoy exercising my imagination with a textual book, but I’m just as likely to reach for a manga as a novel. My feed aggregator is slowly filling with more and more webcomics for this same reason. And I reach for the manga, the webcomics, and the novels that are able to fully utilize their media to draw me in to a sustained story.
As a child, I studied ballet. I can remember rehearsals as a young adult where the artistic director and the choreographer continually nagged us to tell the story. The story of the ballet, the story of the individual dance we were doing. If our movements weren’t contributing to building the story, then we weren’t doing it correctly. And this applied to dances that weren’t part of a story ballet, too. Our recital pieces were mini-stories, danced by each class.
This comes back to me every time I watch figure skating competitions. I’ve noticed the more successful skaters find the story in their music and bring it out in their choreography. Amazingly, these tend to be the skaters who turn professional and take over my weekend afternoons as their exhibitions are run over and over again on the television.
Even my favorite musicians are the ones who can consistently provide a story in their work. In their lyrics. In the music if there are no lyrics. I love the story. My favorite band at the moment is my favorite band, simply because their lyricist is a fantastic storyteller.
Thinking about it, I’ve come to realize that the medium has little to do with a good story. The story is the story on its own merit, and the medium is the vehicle delivering the story. I don’t know if that will help me at all, but someone else might find it interesting.
I really feel this post on cartooning says it all, but honestly when you combine images and words, you are tapping into two learning modalities. You’re engaging the reader’s mind on two levels. That’s twice the opportunity to have your message sink in.
Something to keep in mind when developing products designed to make a point…