I’ve spent the week cleaning up my Flickr account, mostly employing better tags and re-setting rights.  I got to thinking about how I assign rights to my work. If it’s my own and not tied to some project, I’m likely going to use Creative Commons. If I’ve manipulated someone else’s work or put pieces from a bunch of other perople’s work together, I’m going to reserve all rights, simply because there are rights present that aren’t mine to give.

A few months back, a student contacted me and asked if he could use one of Dead Bunny’s videos in a web site he was building for a class project. I was only too happy to give him permission.

It occurred to me that day, as it did while I was working through my photos, that I know far too many young people who would have just taken the video and never given it a second thought, simply because it was online. I’ve actually had repeated conversations with my students because they’ll actually tell me it’s okay to take something online. To them, it doesn’t matter. It’s online, free for the taking.

I’ll often ask how being available online makes it different from a book, where we make a ruckus about what they can use, how much they can use, and how they have to acknowledge it. It’s still something someone created and published. The only response I ever get back is, “Because it’s online. The internet is free.”

Now, these are kids who’ve probably never heard, either in or out of context, the phrase, “Information wants to be free”, although it comes to mind every single time I have this conversation, but they’re certainly ready to embrace it because we aren’t doing enough to help them see that media is media.  We start by applying copyright symbols to web materials. Every citation guide in existence has quietly added online sources to their examples. But if we don’t talk about the copyright inherent in all media, then we’re going to continue having conversations with students about how protections extend to media, regardless of its form or location.

Thinking about how information organization is a cultural affair has me thinking about the effect of the cultures I’ve been exposed to on my own life. I was lucky to grow up in an area that was rich with culture and with a family that enjoys celebrating other cultures.

Being exposed to so many different cultures growing up has led to some interesting situations as an adult, though. For example, when I was in college, we had to create a multidisciplinary lesson plan for kinesiology. One of the disciplines had to be P.E. or health, so I elected to weave in social studies and teach an Israeli folk dance I’d learned a few summers before. But the day I went to  present my lesson, I wore my Ancient Egypt vest without thinking. I realized it as I was setting up my lesson and turned the first two minutes of the lesson into a brief lecture on why I was removing my vest for the lesson.

Before that, I grew up with Greek mythology. I liked reading different versions of the same myth and figuring out what was different between them. Roman mythology didn’t interest me nearly so much. Rome seemed like a bunch of warriors, and I wasn’t into war. Anyone who confused the two pantheons was quickly straightened out. In fact, I’m so rabid about keeping the Greek and Roman pantheons straight that it’s a wonder I made it through Fred Saberhagen’s Swords Trilogy. To date, his disregard for the pantheons is the worst I’ve ever seen.

Even better was when I was working on a recent revision for one of my novels and discovered that I had really taken things too far. Before I started the very first revision, I did some research on the groups that have inhabited southern England, where the key points of the novel take place. My research didn’t turn up any sign of Roman occupation…so the key location is a hidden Roman temple. And in the temple are trap chambers reminiscent of the kind you see in treasure hunting movies set in Egyptian or South American pyramids. The trap chambers are slightly more acceptable because the manuscript is supposed to be spoofing treasure hunt media, but it still bothers me.

I’m always grateful for opportunities that allow me to experience different cultures. I’d like to believe I can be respectful of these cultures. I just wish my work would reflect that more often.

Sometimes, we teachers have moments of inspiration where we hit on just the right explanation at just the right moment to help a student make sense of something that frustrates them. I had one of those moments last week.

In all fairness, it probably wasn’t as much an inspiration as it was a moment to realize how to put something I’d already realized into use. In working through material for Dead Bunny, I’d already thought about how coordinate geometry teaches us to locate things in space (among other things). I had already noted that (x,y) is an address, a location for a point in space. I just hadn’t spent much time thinking about what that really meant because I didn’t get that far with Dead Bunny’s various activities.

Last week, I got a fraction of a second to think about it. A student was working on converting standard linear equations into slope-intercept form, except she kept dropping the y out of the equation as she worked. I kept reminding her to keep track of the y, but it didn’t help. Suddenly, it hit me. I showed her the following:

123
Anytown

and asked her if a postman could deliver a letter addressed this way. She acknowledged that he couldn’t, and I told her that’s what she was effectively doing. When she lost track of the y, she was creating an address of (x , and no point was going to be able to be found. The proverbial light bulb went off, and she didn’t lose track of the y again.

There is a lot of discussion around the web and among teachers in general about whether or not teaching just the process is better than creating associations. I’ve tried both and find that it really depends on the material I’m trying to teach. More often than not, though, I find that if I can hit on the right metaphor, retell the right story, then my students are more likely to understand the skill or concept. Even better, they’re more likely to remember it. I can’t tell you how many students have caught their own mistakes, recounting my own story to me as they fix the problem.

Teaching by metaphor (or by association, really) can be helpful in that it can show the student how something should go if done correctly, and it can give them an emotional connection that will better help them remember what to do in the future because they can draw on that story.

It’s Teacher Appreciation Week, and my workplace offered students the opportunity to buy Flowergrams for their teachers. I got this rather lovely bouquet from one of my high schoolers.

Teacher Appreciation Week


The center’s directors also gave us travel mugs filled with chocolate. It was pretty nice!

I wear a lot of hats at work, among them one I kind of adopted as a means of dealing with my own stress. I’m a bit of goofball (hoping desperately that her family and friends don’t out her as a major goofbal). I’ll do completely pointless, silly things to cheer myself up. I’ll even do it to cheer someone else up when things get rough.

There are many ways of accomplishing this. I put my hands up to my head and say, “Moose!” I’ll crack a lame joke. Depending on my mood and the situation, I occasionally even branch out into bizarre voices. Last night was one of those night. We all felt like it had already been a long week, and we were all a bit slaphappy, and when something happened with my students at one point I just kind of broke into the monster voice. I wish I could remember what I’d said, both because it was funny and because it would have made this so much easier. Instead, I had to settle for the first that came to mind when I mentally asked myself, “What could you possibly say to a student in this voice?”

Monster

I’ve been told I seem like the kind of person who has many voices waiting to get out. (I hope this works. I haven’t had the best luck embedding files into posts, and it doesn’t appear to be embedding the little player.)

I don’t like Ariel.

No, that’s not true. It’s not that I don’t like Ariel. I actually hate her. I have since I was sixteen. Teenaged me just couldn’t get behind a girl who gives up a critical (non-harmful) component of her personal identity to pursue a guy she doesn’t know anything about, but thinks is cute. Adult me doesn’t care for characters who do this, either.

The Disney Princesses in general have come under quite a bit of attack in recent months because of the lessons these characters, beloved by little girls for decades, have the potential to share. No one is looking at the fairy tale from which the Princess came or the period during which the movie was made. They’re too busy worrying that a mindset from days gone by will translate as “classic” and “expected” for girls of today.

And they’re not wrong for worrying.

Not too long ago, a picture was making the rounds on the feminist sites where someone had taken each Disney Princess and boiled her down to her essence. While I hotly disagree with the analysis of bookworm Belle, it illustrates the lesson a little girl could pick up from her favorite princess. The problem is, it’s not just little girls being imprinted with these lessons. Web series The Guild illustrates just how widespread the problem is when a male character insults another male character by telling him he has the street smarts of a cartoon princess.

When everyone learns a lesson incorrectly, it becomes that much harder to set the record straight.

I do appreciate how Huffy’s marketing department seems to be approaching the situation. The new commercial for their Disney Princess bikes shows two little girls off on a quest to rescue a prince (a teddy bear). Once he’s free, they take off on another adventure. The commercial has been already been recognized for promoting feminist values for little girls, but is it really enough?

It might prove to be a good start if the effort can be sustained by other girl-focused media.

I don’t hear it often, but occasionally a student will ask me why I’m forcing him to learn a math skill he’s struggling with. I usually start asking about hobbies, interests, and future plans and tie what he’s doing to that. The student still grumbles, but he gets back to work, soon mastering the skill and grumbling about the next one.

While I love to learn new things, I can sympathize with my students. It’s hard to make yourself work through challenging skills when you can’t see where you’re going.

A couple of summers ago, I decided I’d had it with not being able to draw anything more than a stick figure and started working through the beginning lessons at Drawspace. The first lessons were simple enough, but I quickly got to the real-life human lessons. I hated them. I dreaded them. In fact, I kind of put them off because I didn’t want to do them. I completely ignored the last lesson because I felt like I couldn’t handle yet another failure (and a friend had loaned me an anatomy book that was proving far more useful).

While I was avoiding the lessons I didn’t want to do, I was enjoying the cartoon lessons. It didn’t take long to realize that if I wanted those to come out well, then I had to learn about human proportions and the basics of drawing a well-constructed, believable person. I didn’t go back to the lessons I’d skipped. Instead, I started experimenting with drawing people. Then, I discovered a manga how-to that showed me a way to take my stick figures and build them up to people.

I can almost draw human-shaped people now, as long as you don’t look at their hands, but I wouldn’t have reached that point if I hadn’t put myself through the challenge of actually learning about human shapes and proportions, my people would still have this grammar-school blob quality to them.

Sometimes, when a student is really struggling to see where he is in the big picture and I can see that he needs that big picture clarified for him, I share that with him. He usually asks to draw instead of doing math, but I just laugh and make him get back to work. When the next skill is easier, he more often than not tackles it because he can see that he knows part of the skill already. The big picture is that much clearer because he pushed himself through the challenge.

There have been quite a few jokes lately on the widespread misinterpretation of the quote, “Information wants to be free.” Call it optimistic hopefulness. Call it brutish ignorance. Call it whatever you will. The simple fact of the matter is that because “free” has multiple definitions, people interpreted it to fit their worldview (perhaps saying something about themselves in the process).

Most of my students haven’t heard this quote, in context or out, but they definitely face the inherent spirit of it on a near-daily basis as they learn about copyright and plagiarism. I’ll never forget the student who, in all seriousness, told me that she could take anything she found on the internet and do whatever she wanted with it because it was “free”. I quickly explained to her that copyright does extend to work on the internet, and it’s only free if it’s specifically labeled public domain. She wasn’t too sure about that, but she was at least willing to consider that I knew what I was talking about.

It’s amazing how many of my students have either not been taught this, or have tuned out the teacher. These students tend to be frustrating because they whine on and on (in a private tutoring center, no less) about how they can’t get to the information they want for a school project because some jerk had the gall to lock it up away from them. They then boast that they can just find that same information somewhere else…and that never works out. They don’t get it. They don’t understand.

What they’re missing, and what I think is a part of what makes copyright protection so nice, is that information doesn’t want to be certain definitions of free. It wants to be unrestrained, but at the same time be respected and valued.

Most of my students head back to school tomorrow, and they’re excited.

Okay, maybe they aren’t, but they’re already asking that one question every teacher dreads: Why do I have to learn this?

We’re taught in teacher prep programs that this is a learner’s driving question once they become a teenager. Sometimes, it’s obvious why they have to learn something. They can see how it will help them in their desired career or allow them to pursue a hobby. Some of my high schoolers are willing to learn anything that they think will make them look better than their friends; others just want to know what they need to survive the next test, and they don’t look at applicability past that.

Adult learners are also driven by this question. They’re looking for things to help them perform their job more efficiently. Some are looking to be more creative in their job. Some are just looking to strengthen or diversify their skill set. But just like teenagers, adults aren’t always so willing to sit through lessons that they can see that they need without giving into the whiny teenager voice asking, “Why do I have to learn this?”

Is there a cure? Yes, help learners see how what they’re working on connects to what they will be doing in the future. It’s not foolproof (teenagers seem particularly talented at thinking they’ll never have to do anything they don’t want to once they’re adults), but it can make teaching a tiny bit easier.

On Dinosaur King this morning, Rex defined “savannah” in a way that was reminiscent of Magi-Nation. Seriously, what is keeping that show from the E/I label? (Best guess: episode length)

It did make me think about M.A.S.K., as it often does, and I got to wondering about what I learned from episodes (not the PSAs at the end of each episode- I really liked preachy cartoons, didn’t I?). It was things like- apple seeds contain trace amounts of a poisonous substance, how two-way mirrors work, bullet trains are the fastest on earth.

You know…useful stuff! *grin*

© 2010 Rebecca Thomas Designs Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 72 access attempts in the last 7 days.