In cleaning up and reorganizing my notes and thoughts, I’ve come to realize that a tag needs to be broad enough to mark more than one artifact, but be narrow enough to be useful. It’s interesting to see how that mindset affects my organizing while I try to see how everything fits together.

I’m also realizing how many note-taking and journaling apps give you the option of both categories and tags. I thought at first that I’d just stick with my tags, because that would give me the flexibility to retrieve things the way I need them, but most of these systems don’t function the way you expect if you don’t make use of the categories.

At first, I was frustrated because it looked like you could put a note in only one category and then not be able to access it somewhere else, or like you’d be forced into a narrow classification scheme. If a note went into this category, then it wouldn’t have access to that category’s tags. It felt so narrow-minded.

And then I realized I was the narrow-minded one. While categories are rigid and won’t share notes with other categories, tags aren’t so unfriendly. The same tag can exist in different categories, and in most systems it can allow you to see everything with that tag across your notes in the system, or it can allow you to see only the notes with that tag in a specific category. It’s a far more fluid system than I was interpreting it as. Really, it comes down to how I think I would look for a note, and then being open to looking for not only notes but specific topics.

I think this project just became a lot simpler.

When I was in school, my English teachers always encouraged us to read our papers backwards in order to help catch spelling and grammar mistakes. When I was a proofreader, and later an editor, the leads always wanted me to read documents backwards as the last step before I gave it back to them.

When I briefly dabbled in web design, I quickly discovered that reading backwards also helps catch tags that aren’t closed.

A couple of weekends ago, I got it into my head to watch Serenity and then Firefly right behind, except I watched the episodes in reverse order. Watching the entire series backwards helped me see things I hadn’t noticed before.

It made me think. I’ve been wrestling with flow issues in my fiction, and I wondered if reading backwards might solve at least part of the problem. So, I sat down with the storyboard for my current project, and I read the scenes in reverse order. Sure enough, I found a few spots where I hadn’t fully thought out the plot or a character, and I was able to address those problems right there. Doing that work means that I should end up happier with this manuscript when it’s finished, and it means fewer scenes that I’ll have to add in during the editing stage.

Reading your work backwards, be it a story, a process document, or code, causes you to look at your work in a different way, and it helps you see errors that you might have missed because your mind tells you that what you meant to write is already there. You’ll find misspelled words, missed punctuation, and dropped words. It’s an additional step that can help make your work look that much more polished.

I have a lot on my plate these days. I’m editing one of my novels. I just finished the Beginner level of the online drawing program I’ve been working through for the past couple of months. I’ve finally decided to put myself through an intensive study of knowledge management and information architecture.

I’m also trying to move back to the original Rebecca Thomas Designs website.

The original site was structured to meet the needs of the person I was when I started blogging. Each of my interests had their own blog, blocked off by Multiply. The design was clean, simple, able to be appropriate, regardless of which blog you were looking at.

The problem came when my focus changed, and the multiple blogs no longer reflected the person I realized was hiding in here. The person I am is a blend of teacher, content creator, and leader/coach; and now I want my blog to reflect that.

It would seem like some of the old blogs could just be re-purposed to fit this new me…but I want something more complicated. I want all of my blog entries to show up in the main blog, but leave people the option to see only the topics they want within these three major spheres of my life (preferably without the pain that comes with managing a blog broken apart by Multiply).

A couple of weeks ago, I started playing with FriendFeed and Yahoo Pipes to create a pair of all-in-one stops for Dead Bunny. Using tags and categories in his blog, Delicious, goodreads, Twitter and YouTube, I’ve pulled together an easy-to-use lifestream. It was fairly simple to put together, and running Yahoo Pipes through Feedburner has already allowed people to take advantage of subscribing to Dead Bunny’s content and getting it emailed to them. My next step is to figure out how to pull it into my original blog, and then to create a specific corner for him on the original website.

I’m already looking at creating a Yahoo Pipe for my design content. It’s really forcing me to think about how I use websites and tags to present and organize my work.

Even more importantly, I’m also starting to look at this as a means to pull together some sort of portfolio. I may have to build a few to reflect my work in different contexts, but I’m definitely looking forward to it.

In short, tags and categories can be used through FriendFeed and Yahoo Pipes (or other lifestreaming/mash-up tools) to create focused streams of your content. You can also use Yahoo Pipes to pull together information on topics that you’re researching.

It feels like it wasn’t all that long ago when everyone was screaming that if a user couldn’t find what they wanted in three clicks, then they’d leave your site, never to return. It led to some, if you’ll forgive the expression, pretty shallow sites.

It’s possible that a couple of years ago, people had a hard time staying focused for longer than that. These days, everyone is stuck in “information overload” mode, and people are more willing to actively search for what they need.

It’s now slowly being suggested that instead of confining the user to a limited number of clicks, creating an information pathway that makes sense, an “information scent”, for the user will prove more helpful.

Information architects have been singing the praises of information scent for some time now, but it’s interesting to see other disciplines slowly looking to it as a viable design structure.

As I’m reading through my aggregator and reading list every week, I find topics that make me think, “Wow! This needs to be shared.” I generally resist the impulse for a few days, waiting to see what the fallout is.

You see, good blog posts seem to inspire some sort of fallout, whether it’s positive or negative.

That happened with this posting of five design principles. I thought all five of them were fairly obvious. Technology servers humans. Experience is designed with the user in mind  Design should never be obvious or overly complex.

Seems pretty straight forward, really. The standard things you cover the minute you set foot in any basic design class.

Sure enough, though, designers of various breeds were weighing in on it. Working Solo actually pointed me to the post to begin with with Leah’s post on how design is contextual. It’s true. Try taking an experience out of the context it was intended for, and you can almost guarantee yourself a baffled audience.

However, that same point was being contested by Mark Boulton, a designer who has pretty much seen it all (and tends to have an interesting take on it). In some ways, Boulton’s rant reminds me of the portfolio on display at the Art Institute downtown. The Industrial Design students have pictures of some of their work, along with an explanation of what the item is and where the student envisioned it being used. If not for the description, I’d have never guessed what half of the items were, but there was a definite creativity and usability to the items I could identify. It’s a blending work.

So…design is usable, but can be artistic. Design is contextual, but doesn’t have to be dry in its context. (I’m pretty sure that’s oversimplifying a complex question.)

Actually, stand up for your community.

Those hiring freelance artists, regardless of what the artform is, respect the person you’re commissioning.

If you are a member of either or both groups, drop everything you are doing and go read this post now. Then make a pledge to yourself. If you are an artist, pledge to not work for pennies, to be willing to do a little research and charge what you’re worth. If you’re an employer, make a pledge to do a little research and pay an artist what they’re worth.

This message has been slowly winding its way through the writing community, but the simple fact of the matter is that anyone who practices any type of art, be it literary, visual, performing, or digital, could stand to benefit from this advice.

Your time and talent are worth something. If the person hiring you feels they need to reach outside their own workgroup to hire you, then they need to make it worth your time.

While the article covers a number of accessibility tips, I really like the section on links!
Apply Links the Right Way Links are a very important part of a web page. Linking is one of the inherent features of web pages that make the medium so attractive. Links in books would be fantastic if it were only possible. Due to the importance of links, I?d be remiss if at this juncture I didn?t address them. What follows are definitions of five important rules about links: Redundant Link Phrases Don?t use the same link phrase more than once unless it leads to the same place and be descriptive of where the link goes. In other words don?t use link phrase terms like ?read more about this topic? more than once unless the link phrase happens to lead to the same place. Descriptive Link Phrases As suggested above, be descriptive with your link phrases. All too common links phrases such as ?click here? simply aren?t enough. You?ll be making users click on links just to find out where they lead. Even if you feel the context adequately explains where ?click here? goes, on the web they may be removed from the context which defines them. Link Separation Separate your links by not making them consecutive. Putting even a lowly comma between them will satisfy this requirement. If they?re not used inline with text content, often the best solution is to organize them in an unordered list as mentioned previously as this easily provides the needed separation. Even as list-organized links, they can be styled horizontally with a simply entry in the page?s style sheet thus meeting the needs of your visual layout. Link Identification Underlining your links is conventional, widely accepted, and the best of all a recognized methods. While underlined links aren?t absolutely necessary and you may choose to offer them another way, do make them apparent and keep them uniform, just don?t depend on color alone to make this so. Link Interactivity Make sure your links are interactive. This may be accomplished by removing the link underline when a user hovers over them with a mouse or focuses on them with their keyboard ? which is something even some seasoned developers tend to overlook. The interactive styling depends on their static styling so create a dramatic-enough change. But try not to make this interactivity depend solely on color alone unless said links belong to a very distinctive grouping such as a well-marked navigation list.
You really should read the entire article, though it covers so much ground! Meanwhile, I?m going to be working on planning out relevant links for my web site redesign. Cross-posted from DesignNiche.

My actual design goal for this entire website is to make the main page a portal that will entice or guide people to explore the niche of their choice. Not many people are aware of this because I haven’t made many strides in that direction. I’ve considered everything from a blog that pulls from all of the sites into the main site, to a magazine style front. There is so much content lying in wait in this site that I want visitors to be able to quickly make use of what’s here to find what they need.

I’ve had the portal idea stuck firmly in my head for almost as long as this site has existed.

That said, I was intrigued by this article that put forth portals as not Web 2.0 friendly. The thought is that they can’t be remixed easily and that they merely stand as guardians of the information contained within. I’m not so sure I agree with that. I think a portal site is what you make of it. If you build within it the ability for someone to be able to search the compartmentalized areas to find a more holistic picture of what they’re searching for, I think a portal could actually help minimize a visitor’s search time and lead to a more clear mash-up of your own material.

It’s definitely worth keeping in mind as I look toward designing the site’s next phase.

While I was working on my NaNovel, I sat down to list out my background as part of pulling together my elevator speech for the novel. As my novel is set at a performing arts school, I thought it might be relevant to include my own performing arts background as part of it to demonstrate why I felt like pursuing this particular story idea.

Some time back, I actually wrote out what I could remember of it and placed it within  my skills portfolio on this site, but I hadn’t actually thought about what that lengthy page actually said about me. It doesn’t cover the hours I’ve put into studying ballet or belly dancing when I wasn’t enrolled in a class, nor does it address my choreography experience (which is rather extensive, and nearly landed me a job choreographing the ballet in a friend’s opera that never pulled together). It doesn’t even address my performances in arts and sciences competitions and courts at Amtgard.

As I’m slowly working to redefine my life, to point myself a direction, I’m becoming very aware of how much that background has impacted me (aside from the desire to be doing something, preferably of a dancing or singing variety). I created a CafePress line illustrating some of the ways writing is like acting, and I have plans to explore how acting or performing is like other activities I enjoy.

I’m looking rather heavily into becoming involved with educational media and games, and keep running into the term “persona”. I hear that word, I think of my Amtgard character. Instead, i should be thinking automatically of the meaning interaction designers mean: a fictional being designed to represent a potential user. Personas seem to go in and out of fashion at will, but they’ve lately been showing up again. That’s what actually made me start to take serious notice of them. I was reading an article relating method acting to developing personas, and I couldn’t stop myself from laughing. Acting was showing up in education, in a way I hadn’t already thought to connect the two.

It’s an interesting analogy, and one definitely worth keeping in mind as I’m working on various projects.

I’m reading an e-book this week that’s got me thinking, not as much about the content as the organization of the content. This was one of the aims of the book, so it’s successful in that!

It’s filled with flowcharts to help give the concepts in the book a visual element. The book is seeking to show how much the topic defies organization by trying to impose organization. When the book is merely illustrating the book’s own structure, the lines in the flowchart are straight. When it is trying to demonstrate the nebulous nature of the the topic, the lines are curved.

Now, many studies have been done on straight lines vs. curved, or organic, lines, but this e-book really uses the lines well to help convey the intended meaning of the flowchart.

It’s almost inspirational from a design standpoint.

© 2010 Rebecca Thomas Designs Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 72 access attempts in the last 7 days.